बहुजन की जीत, यूजीसी ने अपना ब्राह्मणवाद वापस ले लिया 2016 राज-पत्र

Alya एकता

In a remarkable decision, University Grants Commission roll backed its 5^वें may 2016 notification on Thursday, which prescribed a two part process for the admissions in MPhil/ Ph.D. programs according to this oral interviews, or viva voce were the sole criterion for admissions.

Adoption of this notification and its implementation in various universities such as University of Gujarat, Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), दिल्ली विश्वविद्यालय (का) faced a lot of criticism and protests by students. This notification led to the destruction of socially inclusive Admission Policies in M.Phil/ Ph.D. and became a tool in the hands of Brahmanical faculties which strengthened the discrimination of students from oppressed groups such as ST SC and OBC.

This notification suggested that the “entrance test” will have uniform qualifying marks of 50% across the categories, which meant that there were more chances of social exclusion and academic atrocity.

JNU saw the strongest student agitation and protests where a student Dileep Yadav went on indefinite hunger strike and demanded that the decision should be nullified.

Rahul Sonpimple said, I along with our Bahujan friends Dileep Yadav, Dawa Sherpa Dileep Kumar, Shakil, Prashant Nihal , Bhupali Magare, Mritunjay Singh, Mulayam Singh were suspended for protesting against Brahmanical UGC gazette. We kept fighting against both. After our suspension, many students joined the movement and fought without caring the fear created by casteist JNU administration and some casteist faculties (from both the camp – Right & left).

He further said, Finally UGC has decided that it will take back its draconian gazette. This was also the time when we saw the real faces of the so called progressive (Brahmanical) forces in the campus. But at the end struggle remains, hope remains.

Abdul Nafey committee, constituted by the JNU administration analyzed the admission related data and concluded that discrimination based on caste is, जो पार्टी जनता के बीच लोकप्रिय आख्यानों का निर्माण करने में सक्षम है या अन्य दलों के तर्क के बारे में जनता को भ्रमित करने में सक्षम है,, एक हकीकत, thus it recommended that the viva weightage be reduced from 30 % सेवा मेरे 15 % in order to overcome this discrimination. There were similar data available from other universities as well which offered similar conditions of discrimination.

This model acted as a means to restrict the implementation of the constitutionally guaranteed reservation policy for those who have suffered the most. With such a restriction there was a visible decrease in the number of seats from minority communities, earlier in 2017 it was as low as 102 and this year the seat toll has reached 720 और फिल्म के अंत में कैमरा एक चमेली के फूल को झूम रहा है.

In addition to the clause of written test as well as oral viva voce, JNU faced yet another provision of the new regulation – the cap on the number of Ph.D. students a teacher can supervise. Many prominent professors criticized the implementation of the same in JNU,

Ayesha Kidwai, argued in “How the new UGC regulations do affect prospective students applying to JNU? Kidwai stated that due to this regulation the seats will be reduced drastically and may center of JNU will not have a single seat of M.Phil/Ph.D, Due to this Regulation the admission policy will be affected and be disastrous for JNU, it will be a blow to social justice, and the researcher advisory committee will curtail the academic freedom in the campus.

Nivedita Menon, a Professor along with other Professor in JNU VC Sabotages Democratic Functioning of Academic Council to push through Anti-Social Justice Policies, stated: “We, faculty members of the JNU Academic Council, are shocked and dismayed at the manner in which the Vice Chancellor has conducted the 142 Academic Council meeting of December 23 (adjourned to December 26). यह बैठक बहुत ही कम उपस्थिति वाली थी क्योंकि यह शीतकालीन अवकाश के बीच में अल्प सूचना पर आयोजित की गई थी, पुनर्निर्धारण के लिए कई अनुरोधों के बावजूद. पिछले मिनट (141) एकेडमिक काउंसिल की जो बैठक प्रसारित की गई थी उसमें कई त्रुटियां थीं, गलतबयानी, और झूठ. इनमें से कई पर अकादमिक परिषद के कई सदस्यों ने ध्यान दिलाया था, रजिस्ट्रार को लिखित अभ्यावेदन सहित हम उस तरीके को अस्वीकार करते हैं जिसमें सदन में कई लोगों की राय नहीं सुनी गई और आचरण में लोकतांत्रिक मानदंडों का उल्लंघन किया गया। 142 कुलपति के नेतृत्व में प्रशासन द्वारा अकादमिक परिषद की बैठक।”

भारतीय संविधान की प्रस्तावना अपने नागरिकों को यह गारंटी देती है कि राज्य उन्हें न्याय प्रदान करेगा (सामाजिक, आर्थिक और राजनीतिक) and equality of status and opportunity to all irrespective of any biases.

Bhupali Magare said, “The struggle for Social Justice is complex and consistent. After witnessing the rejection by JNU authority to listen the students voices that demanded reduction in viva-voce to 10%, scrapping UGC Gazette, Implementation of Reservation, punishment to those who wrote racial dossier and other demands; after seeing the humiliation and targeting of students belonging to oppressed sections by so-called progressives n their regressive friends and by admin of JNU; this particular news that UGC mentioned that written test will be of 70% and Viva 30% is in a way a pro-student information. निश्चित रूप से, it gives us little happiness, and this also tells us that we are yet to attain Social Justice, attain Gender Justice inside this campus and in the society we are living in.”

लेख 38 of the Indian Constitution directs the State to secure a social order for the promotion of the welfare of the people. लेख 38(1) states that “The State shall strive to promote the welfare of the people by securing and protecting as effectively as it may a social order in which justice, सामाजिक, आर्थिक और राजनीतिक, shall inform all the institutions of the national life.

लेख 38(2) states that “ The State shall, विशेष रूप से, strive to minimize the inequalities in income, and endeavor to eliminate inequalities in status, सुविधाएं, and opportunities, and not only amongst individuals but also amongst groups of people residing in different areas or engaged in different vocations.

इस प्रकार जीवन के सभी क्षेत्रों के लोगों का सामाजिक समावेश और कल्याण हमारी लोकतांत्रिक व्यवस्था का एक महत्वपूर्ण पहलू बना हुआ है.

सामाजिक समावेशन किसी भी व्यक्ति या समूह के प्रति भेदभाव या घृणा अपराध के बिना जीवन के सभी क्षेत्रों के लोगों को लाभान्वित करता है. ऐसी समावेशन नीतियां लोकतंत्र के आधार पर स्थापित की जाती हैं, सहनशीलता, स्वीकार, और सम्मान के प्रति सम्मान. ये नीतियां मुख्य रूप से सीखने में बहिष्कार और बाधाओं को कम करने पर ध्यान केंद्रित करती हैं जो बदले में वृद्धि और विकास को बढ़ावा देती हैं.

यह ऐतिहासिक निर्णय छात्रों के कई विरोध प्रदर्शनों और आंदोलनों के बाद आया, जिससे यह ध्यान रखना महत्वपूर्ण हो गया है कि भारत का लोकतंत्र अब उसके नागरिकों के हाथों में है, जिन्हें विरोध करना ही होगा।, आंदोलन, परिवर्तन लाने के लिए चर्चा और असहमति.